September
2006: by Darrell Nordstrom
More asset protection strategies
As business owners many of us are so subjected
to the busy day-to-day hands on operation of our businesses that
we don't devote enough time to protecting our assets.
In the previous articles my two colleagues,
Dale Berg and Jim Nellis, discussed asset protection methods including
the purchase of keyman life insurance, buy-sell life insurance,
disability coverage, and other insurance products. There are other
significant risks that owner/operators will want to address.
It is common to see a successful business accumulate
cash, real estate, and other investments that are not related
to the direct operation of the business. This situation has at
least three "RISKS" that should be considered.
First, to the extent that these assets are not
involved in regular operations the tax rate has historically been
at very high levels (50% +) and does not enjoy the small business
rate of 18%. The result is that the asset goes "unprotected"
to the extent that the tax erodes value. (The recent federal budget
proposals may add some relief to these tax rates. However, it
is still necessary to reduce these "costs" to add
value to the business.")
A second issue is more direct because there
is no creditor protection of these assets if the business was
"attacked" and the entire proceeds, not just the taxable
portion, would be at risk. Some businesses have more exposure
to lawsuits by their very nature because of environmental risks,
dangerous goods, or similar operations. This doesn't eliminate
this risk for others though, as lawsuits can result from incidents
such as car accidents. The problem is not always fully covered
by liability policies, although the insurance usually helps.
The third risk occurs because of a loss of the
ability to utilize the capital gains exemption at the time of
sale if the passive assets exceed 10% of the total value of the
business. The business must use 90% of its assets "actively"
to allow the shareholder to claim the capital gains exemption.
Fortunately, there is a relatively straight
forward solution to these three problems.
Most tax accountants and lawyers will be quick
to point out the advantages of structuring an operating company
(OPCO) and a holding company (HOLDCO). The HOLDCO should retain
your investments such as excess cash, real estate, and all non-operating
assets. The OPCO should contain what it says - operating assets.
The results are straightforward and dramatic.
The assets - often cash – can be moved to the HOLDCO and
thereby creditor protected. If the cash is needed in the OPCO
it can be loaned back to the OPCO from the HOLDCO and the loan
must be securitized.
The assets moved to HOLDCO will not attract
lower tax rates and therefore should be invested in tax-deferred
vehicles such as real estate or low trading securities. This addresses
the tax risk to the extent it defers paying tax as the rate on
capital gains is only one half the regular rate.
The third problem of losing the capital gains
exemption is also solved as the OPCO shares can now be purchased
by a new owner and the exemption would be allowed because of the
purification of the OPCO. (This also offers a practical "winwin"
solution to the succession issue of the business because the real
estate can be retained in the HOLDCO and leased back to the new
purchaser as part of the sales agreement. This lowers the purchase
price for the new owners, making the business easier to buy and
provides monthly cash flow to the vendor.)
These re-organizational stages often include
even more sophisticated planning concepts that could include more
than one holding company and family trusts. At the end of the
day each step is designed to protect assets from the taxman, from
creditors, from whatever has potential to compromise efficiency.
At the same time, the other typical advantages
of strategies such as IPPs (individual pension plans), RRSPs,
RAs (retiring allowances), health and welfare trusts, and many
more are still effective. The pensions and RRSPs can easily provide
creditor protection by naming a preferred beneficiary, often the
spouse of the owners.
Successful owner/operators spend a lifetime
accumulating significant assets. The more successful the business
owner, the more demand for effective and efficient planning from
all perspectives.
Devoting appropriate time and funds to this
task with your tax accountants, lawyers, and financial planners
produces the required results.
. . .
About the author
Darrell Nordstrom, CFP, RFP, CLU, CHFC, is a Senior Financial
Advisor with Assante Financial Management Ltd. He can be reached
at 1-877-837-3377 or 306-665-3377, or click
to email Darrell Nordstrom.
Disclaimer
Please contact a professional advisor to discuss your particular
circumstances prior to acting on the information above. The opinions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of
Assante Financial Management Ltd.
+ Back to Latest News &
Resources page
|